European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 23-30, February 2011

Colorectal cancer follow-up: Patient satisfaction and amenability to telephone after care

  • K. Beaver

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing & Caring Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Brook Building, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 1772 893715.
    • Kinta Beaver was Professor of Nursing at the School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester when this study was conducted.
  • ,
  • C. Wilson

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
  • ,
  • D. Procter

      Affiliations

    • Colorectal Nursing Service, Blackpool, Fylde & Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Victoria Hospital, Whinney Heys Road, Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR, UK
  • ,
  • J. Sheridan

      Affiliations

    • Colorectal Nursing Service, Blackpool, Fylde & Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Victoria Hospital, Whinney Heys Road, Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR, UK
  • ,
  • G. Towers

      Affiliations

    • Colorectal Nursing Service, Blackpool, Fylde & Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Victoria Hospital, Whinney Heys Road, Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR, UK
  • ,
  • J. Heath

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Blackpool, Fylde & Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Victoria Hospital, Whinney Heys Road, Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR, UK
  • ,
  • S. Susnerwala

      Affiliations

    • Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire PR2 9HT, UK
  • ,
  • K. Luker

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

published online 28 June 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

To explore patient satisfaction on different aspects of follow-up service provision following treatment for colorectal cancer and amenability to an alternative strategy for follow-up care.

Methods and sample

A postal survey was administered to 297 eligible patients who had been treated for colorectal cancer at a large hospital in the North West of England. Patients were asked to indicate responses to questions comprising likert scales, including views on organisation of care, information and advice, personal experience of care, satisfaction with information and care, views on specialist nursing services and amenability to telephone follow-up.

Key results

One hundred and eighty-seven completed surveys were returned (62.97% response rate). Analysis of scale data indicated high levels of satisfaction on all outcome measures but sub-optimal rates of satisfaction on some items. Respondents indicated high levels of satisfaction with information related to disease and treatment but lower levels of satisfaction for items related to genetic risk, sexual attractiveness and self care. Colorectal nurse specialists were highly rated, especially in terms of information provision and personal experience of care. Patients were generally amenable to telephone follow-up, although male patients indicated higher levels of willingness to accept this approach than females.

Conclusions

Satisfaction with traditional medical based follow-up is generally high in this patient cohort but there is room for improvement in terms of service delivery. High levels of satisfaction with the care delivered by colorectal nurse specialists and patient acceptance of telephone follow-up suggests nurse-led telephone follow-up is a viable alternative to traditional hospital based follow-up.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer, Follow-up, Telephone, Specialist nurses, Satisfaction, Survey

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1462-3889(10)00084-0

doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2010.05.006

European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 23-30, February 2011