« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Volume 15, Issue 2
, Pages 130-136
, April 2011
Immediate versus delayed self-reporting of symptoms and side effects during chemotherapy: Does timing matter?
References
- . Symptoms experience: a concept analysis. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2003;30:601–606
- . Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:3552–3561
- . Evaluation of an online platform for cancer patient self-reporting of chemotherapy toxicities. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007;14:264–268
- . Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: results of a questionnaire-based study. The Lancet Oncology. 2006;7:903–909
- . Nurses’ repeat measurement of chemotherapy symptoms: feasibility, resulting information, patient satisfaction. Cancer Nursing. 2003;26:468–475
- . Use of a single-item screening tool to detect clinically significant fatigue, pain, distress, and anorexia in ambulatory cancer practice. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2008;35:20–30
- De Bom, A., Coolbrandt A., Vanhove, E., Wildiers, H., Milisen, K., 2008. Immediate versus delayed self-report of side effects during chemotherapy: a pilot study. Unpublished Dissertation, Nursing Sciences, Catholic University, Leuven.
- . How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the quality-of-life questionnaire C30. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22:3485–3490
- . Symptom burden: a concept analysis and implications to oncology nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2007;34:673–680
- . Symptom evaluation in palliative medicine: patient report vs systematic assessment. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2006;14:444–453
- . Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1979;3:1–23
- . Response shift in quality of life measurement in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Quality of Life Research. 2000;9:603–615
- . Utilising handheld computers to monitor and support patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a UK-based feasibility study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2006;14:742–752
- . Symptom experiences: perceptual accuracy between advanced-stage cancer patients and family caregivers in the home care setting. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2002;20:3495–3507
- . Patients with cancer and next-of-kin response comparability on physical and psychological symptom well-being: trends and measurement issues. Cancer Nursing. 2002;25:358–374
- . CTC v2.0 and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). 2008;http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_v3Retrieved March 31, 2009, from
- . Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62:1126–1137
- . Does the medical record cover the symptoms experienced by cancer patients receiving palliative care? A comparison of the record and patient self-rating. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2001;21:189–196
- . Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study. Quality of Life Research. 2005;14:629–639
- . Application of mobile phone technology for managing chemotherapy-associated side-effects. Annals of Oncology. 2007;18:1887–1892
- . Small-cell lung cancer patients are just ‘a little bit’ tired: response shift and self-presentation in the measurement of fatigue. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16:853–861
- . Treatment type and symptom severity among oncology patients by self-report. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2001;38:359–367
- . Cancer treatment, symptom monitoring, and self-care in adults: pilot study. Cancer Nursing. 2006;29:347–355
- . A comparison of two methods of assessing cancer therapy-related symptoms. Cancer Nursing. 1994;17:37–44
PII: S1462-3889(10)00102-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.06.010
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Volume 15, Issue 2
, Pages 130-136
, April 2011
