Short-term and long-term elderly cancer survivors: A population-based comparative and controlled study of morbidity, psychosocial situation, and lifestyle

Grov, Ellen Karine; Fosså, Sophie D.; Dahl, Alv A.

doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2010.06.011

« Previous Next »European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Volume 15, Issue 3 , Pages 213-220, July 2011

Short-term and long-term elderly cancer survivors: A population-based comparative and controlled study of morbidity, psychosocial situation, and lifestyle☆

Ellen Karine Grov
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Buskerud University College, Faculty of Health, Drammen, Norway
- Corresponding author. The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Montebello, 0310 Oslo, Norway. Tel.: +47 32 20 64 00/+47 22 93 40 00; fax: +47 32 20 64 10.
Sophie D. Fosså
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty Division, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Alv A. Dahl
- Department of Clinical Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty Division, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

published online 02 August 2010.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare how short-term (1–5 years) and long-term (≥5 years) elderly cancer survivors and matched cancer-free controls report their morbidity, psychosocial situation, lifestyle and rurality.

Methods

Among 11 899 persons aged ≥70 years who participated in the second Health Survey of North-Trøndelag County (1995–1997), 479 had been diagnosed with invasive primary cancer 1–10 years before the survey according to Cancer Registry of Norway and self-report. Each patient was randomly age- and gender-matched with three controls without cancer (N=1437). Descriptive statistics was performed.

Results

The cancer sample consisted of 265 (55%) short-term and 214 (45%) long-term survivors, where 223 (47%) lived in rural and 256 (53%) lived in urban areas. No significant differences were found when comparing short and long-term survivors. When all cancer survivors were compared with controls, the survivors reported significantly poorer ‘self-rated health’, and more ‘visits to a medical doctor’. Stepwise logistic regression analysis explained 3.3% variance in being cancer survivors, with ‘visits to a medical doctor’ and ‘personal activity of daily living problems’ as variables contributing to the model. Rural versus urban areas of living explained 6.3% variance in being a rural inhabitant, with ‘self-reported health’ as the variable showing significant contribution to the model.

Conclusion

Short and long-term older cancer survivors showed similar psychosocial situation, morbidity, and lifestyle. Compared to cancer-free controls, survivors reported poorer health, more activity of daily living problems, and more frequently medical consultations. Elderly cancer survivors living in rural areas reported poorer health than those living in urban areas.

Keywords: Morbidity, Lifestyle, Short and long cancer survivorship, Oncology nursing