Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 64, 102303, June 2023

The prevalence and intensity of late effects in patients with testicular germ cell tumors: A first step of instrument development using a stepwise approach

Open AccessPublished:February 27, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102303

      Highlights

      • First step towards a specific instrument for standardized monitoring of individually experienced late effects after testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT).
      • Unique insights into the prevalence and intensity of late effects in TGCT-patients were provided.
      • Fatigue, concentration problems, neuropathy and disturbed overall well-being were the most prevalent late effects.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Patients with Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (TGCT) may suffer from several late effects due to their diagnosis or treatment. Follow-up care aims to identify the recurrence of cancer and support patients with TGCT in their experienced late effects. In the Netherlands, the validated Dutch version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) is used to assess and monitor patient reported symptoms. As a first step to develop a specific USD module for TGCT-patients, it was necessary to identify the prevalence and intensity of late effects in patients with TGCT, covering the physical, social, psychical and existential domains of care.

      Methods

      A cross-sectional study was conducted. First, literature was systematically assessed to create a comprehensive list of symptoms. This generated list was reviewed by expert healthcare professionals and the research group. Lastly, a survey was distributed amongst patients with TGCT in follow-up care in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) outpatient clinic.

      Results

      In total, 65 TGCT-patients completed the survey. All described late effects were recognized by TGCT-patients, with ‘fatigue’, ‘disturbed overall well-being’, ‘concentration problems’ and ‘neuropathy’, indicated as most prevalent and scored with highest intensity. When prioritizing these late effects, patients assigned ‘neuropathy’ as most important.

      Conclusions

      This study provided insight into prevalence and intensity of late effects, as indicated by TGCT-patients. In clinical practice, follow-up care can improve by empowering patients to discuss important items in daily life with their health-care professionals.

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      In Europe, testicular cancer is the most common cancer among young men (
      • Znaor A.
      • Sarfati D.
      • Skakkebæk N.E.
      • Meyts E.R.
      • Laversanne M.
      • Kuli T.
      • Gurney J.
      • Mcglynn K.A.
      • Bray F.
      Testicular cancer incidence predictions in Europe 2010 – 2035: a rising burden despite population ageing.
      ). Testicular cancer represents a wider range of malignant diagnoses, classified by histological characteristics based on the pathological classification of the World Health Organisation (WHO) (
      • Moch H.
      • Cubilla A.L.
      • Humphrey P.A.
      • Reuter V.E.
      • Ulbright T.M.
      The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary System and male genital organs - Part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours.
      ;
      • Williamson S.R.
      • Delahunt B.
      • Magi-Galluzzi C.
      • Algaba F.
      • Egevad L.
      • Ulbright T.M.
      • Tickoo S.K.
      • Srigley J.R.
      • Epstein J.I.
      • Berney D.M.
      • Amin M.B.
      • Compérat E.
      • Humphrey P.A.
      • Idrees M.T.
      • Lopez-Beltran A.
      • Montironi R.
      • Oliva E.
      • Perry-Keene J.
      • Verrill C.
      • Yilmaz A.
      • Young R.H.
      • Zhou M.
      The World health organization 2016 classification of testicular germ cell tumours: a review and update from the international society of urological pathology testis consultation panel.
      ). The most common histology at diagnosis of testicular cancer consists of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (TGCT), representing 90–95% of cases (
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ).
      Treatment is offered according to the histology and staging at diagnosis and could consist of the following components; surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and a combination of the previously mentioned options (
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ). In Western Europe, the majority of patients will be cured of TGCT, with a ten-year survival rate of more than 95% (
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ;
      • Travis L.B.
      • Beard C.
      • Allan J.M.
      • Dahl A.A.
      • Feldman D.R.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Kelly J.L.
      • Dolan M.E.
      • Hannigan R.
      • Constine L.S.
      • Oeffinger K.C.
      • Okunieff P.
      • Armstrong G.
      • Wiljer D.
      • Miller R.C.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Van Leeuwen F.E.
      • Williams J.P.
      • Nichols C.R.
      • Einhorn L.H.
      • Fossa S.D.
      Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations.
      ). Although the treatment schedules for TGCT may appear very promising in the field of survival, patients may experience different serious side-effects, both in short- and long term (
      • Honecker F.
      • Aparicio J.
      • Berney D.
      • Beyer J.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Cathomas R.
      • Clarke N.
      • Cohn-Cedermark G.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Dieckmann K.P.
      • Fizazi K.
      • Fosså S.
      • Germa-Lluch J.R.
      • Giannatempo P.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Gillessen S.
      • Haugnes H.S.
      • Heidenreich A.
      • Hemminki K.
      • Huddart R.
      • Jewett M.A.S.
      • Joly F.
      • Lauritsen J.
      • Lorch A.
      • Necchi A.
      • Nicolai N.
      • Oing C.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Ondrus D.
      • Papachristofilou A.
      • Powles T.
      • Sohaib A.
      • Ståhl O.
      • Tandstad T.
      • Toner G.
      • Horwich A.
      ESMO consensus conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
      ;
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ;
      • Travis L.B.
      • Beard C.
      • Allan J.M.
      • Dahl A.A.
      • Feldman D.R.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Kelly J.L.
      • Dolan M.E.
      • Hannigan R.
      • Constine L.S.
      • Oeffinger K.C.
      • Okunieff P.
      • Armstrong G.
      • Wiljer D.
      • Miller R.C.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Van Leeuwen F.E.
      • Williams J.P.
      • Nichols C.R.
      • Einhorn L.H.
      • Fossa S.D.
      Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations.
      ). The most common long-term toxicities and late effects are second malignant neoplasms, leukaemia, infections, pulmonary complications, cardiovascular toxicity, Raynaud's phenomena, neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, sexual difficulties, cognitive dysfunction, hypogonadism, fatigue, and reduced quality of life (
      • Honecker F.
      • Aparicio J.
      • Berney D.
      • Beyer J.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Cathomas R.
      • Clarke N.
      • Cohn-Cedermark G.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Dieckmann K.P.
      • Fizazi K.
      • Fosså S.
      • Germa-Lluch J.R.
      • Giannatempo P.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Gillessen S.
      • Haugnes H.S.
      • Heidenreich A.
      • Hemminki K.
      • Huddart R.
      • Jewett M.A.S.
      • Joly F.
      • Lauritsen J.
      • Lorch A.
      • Necchi A.
      • Nicolai N.
      • Oing C.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Ondrus D.
      • Papachristofilou A.
      • Powles T.
      • Sohaib A.
      • Ståhl O.
      • Tandstad T.
      • Toner G.
      • Horwich A.
      ESMO consensus conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
      ;
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ;
      • Lauritsen J.
      • Bandak M.
      • Kreiberg M.
      • Skøtt J.W.
      • Wagner T.
      • Rosenvilde J.J.
      • Dysager L.
      • Agerbæk M.
      • Daugaard G.
      Long-term neurotoxicity and quality of life in testicular cancer survivors-a nationwide cohort study.
      ;
      • Travis L.B.
      • Beard C.
      • Allan J.M.
      • Dahl A.A.
      • Feldman D.R.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Kelly J.L.
      • Dolan M.E.
      • Hannigan R.
      • Constine L.S.
      • Oeffinger K.C.
      • Okunieff P.
      • Armstrong G.
      • Wiljer D.
      • Miller R.C.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Van Leeuwen F.E.
      • Williams J.P.
      • Nichols C.R.
      • Einhorn L.H.
      • Fossa S.D.
      Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations.
      ). Late effects are defined as: ‘Health problems that occur months or years after a disease is diagnosed or after treatment has ended. Late effects may be caused by cancer or cancer treatment. They may include physical, mental, and social problems’ (
      National Cancer Institute
      Definition of late effect - NCI dictionary of cancer terms.
      ). The onset of TGCT occurs often at a relatively young age, with a life expectancy of several decades after cure (
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ;
      • Travis L.B.
      • Beard C.
      • Allan J.M.
      • Dahl A.A.
      • Feldman D.R.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Kelly J.L.
      • Dolan M.E.
      • Hannigan R.
      • Constine L.S.
      • Oeffinger K.C.
      • Okunieff P.
      • Armstrong G.
      • Wiljer D.
      • Miller R.C.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Van Leeuwen F.E.
      • Williams J.P.
      • Nichols C.R.
      • Einhorn L.H.
      • Fossa S.D.
      Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations.
      ). Therefore, these long-term problems may have serious impact on TGCT survivors' quality of life during the rest of their lives (
      • Honecker F.
      • Aparicio J.
      • Berney D.
      • Beyer J.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Cathomas R.
      • Clarke N.
      • Cohn-Cedermark G.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Dieckmann K.P.
      • Fizazi K.
      • Fosså S.
      • Germa-Lluch J.R.
      • Giannatempo P.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Gillessen S.
      • Haugnes H.S.
      • Heidenreich A.
      • Hemminki K.
      • Huddart R.
      • Jewett M.A.S.
      • Joly F.
      • Lauritsen J.
      • Lorch A.
      • Necchi A.
      • Nicolai N.
      • Oing C.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Ondrus D.
      • Papachristofilou A.
      • Powles T.
      • Sohaib A.
      • Ståhl O.
      • Tandstad T.
      • Toner G.
      • Horwich A.
      ESMO consensus conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
      ;
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ;
      • Travis L.B.
      • Beard C.
      • Allan J.M.
      • Dahl A.A.
      • Feldman D.R.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Kelly J.L.
      • Dolan M.E.
      • Hannigan R.
      • Constine L.S.
      • Oeffinger K.C.
      • Okunieff P.
      • Armstrong G.
      • Wiljer D.
      • Miller R.C.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Van Leeuwen F.E.
      • Williams J.P.
      • Nichols C.R.
      • Einhorn L.H.
      • Fossa S.D.
      Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations.
      ).
      Follow-up care aims to identify the recurrence of cancer and support TGCT-patients in their experienced late effects. The clinical impression of healthcare professionals, such as nurses and oncologists, does not fully cover, or even underestimate (
      • Oechsle K.
      • Goerth K.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Mehnert A.
      Symptom burden in palliative care patients: perspectives of patients, their family caregivers, and their attending physicians.
      ), patients' symptom intensity and experienced distress (
      • Rhondali W.
      • Hui D.
      • Kim S.H.
      • Kilgore K.
      • Kang J.H.
      • Nguyen L.
      • Bruera E.
      Association between patient-reported symptoms and nurses' clinical impressions in cancer patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit.
      ;
      • Söllner W.
      • DeVries A.
      • Steixner E.
      • Lukas P.
      • Sprinzl G.
      • Rumpold G.
      • Maislinger S.
      How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?.
      ). Assessment of medical and psychosocial burden of late effects is recommended (
      • Travis L.B.
      • Beard C.
      • Allan J.M.
      • Dahl A.A.
      • Feldman D.R.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Daugaard G.
      • Kelly J.L.
      • Dolan M.E.
      • Hannigan R.
      • Constine L.S.
      • Oeffinger K.C.
      • Okunieff P.
      • Armstrong G.
      • Wiljer D.
      • Miller R.C.
      • Gietema J.A.
      • Van Leeuwen F.E.
      • Williams J.P.
      • Nichols C.R.
      • Einhorn L.H.
      • Fossa S.D.
      Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations.
      ). Standardized application of an instrument to assess, monitor and understand late effects, measured using patients’ symptoms, could decrease the burden for patients and their family (). Therefore, the use of an assessment tool or instrument to provide insight in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) will improve follow-up care. Surprisingly, no comprehensive questionnaire currently exists to assess the late effects of cancer diagnosis and treatment during follow-up (
      • Klonoff-Cohen H.
      • Polavarapu M.
      Existence of late-effects instruments for cancer survivors: a systematic review.
      ). There are several questionnaires aimed at cancer survivors in general, or aimed at adolescents and young adults (AYAs) but none were customized by type of cancer and its specific late effects (
      • Klonoff-Cohen H.
      • Polavarapu M.
      Existence of late-effects instruments for cancer survivors: a systematic review.
      ).
      In the Netherlands, the validated Dutch version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), Utrecht Symptom Diary (USD) is used to assess and monitor patient reported symptoms (
      • van der Baan F.H.
      • Koldenhof J.J.
      • de Nijs E.J.
      • Echteld M.A.
      • Zweers D.
      • Hesselmann G.M.
      • Vervoort S.C.
      • Vos J.B.
      • de Graaf E.
      • Witteveen P.O.
      • Suijkerbuijk K.P.
      • de Graeff A.
      • Teunissen S.C.
      Validation of the Dutch version of the Edmonton symptom assessment System.
      ). The USD is an instrument that addresses several symptoms covering the physical and psychical domains of care (
      • Bruera E.
      • Kuehn N.
      • Miller M.J.
      • Selmser P.A.L.
      • Macmillan K.
      Simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients.
      ;
      • Hui D.
      • Bruera E.
      The Edmonton symptom assessment System 25 Years later: past, present, and future developments.
      ; ). For every symptom, patients are requested to assign a score using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (
      • van der Baan F.H.
      • Koldenhof J.J.
      • de Nijs E.J.
      • Echteld M.A.
      • Zweers D.
      • Hesselmann G.M.
      • Vervoort S.C.
      • Vos J.B.
      • de Graaf E.
      • Witteveen P.O.
      • Suijkerbuijk K.P.
      • de Graeff A.
      • Teunissen S.C.
      Validation of the Dutch version of the Edmonton symptom assessment System.
      ). By lacking an existing comprehensive instrument, the USD could be promising in follow-up care, to assess and monitor late effects in cancer patients and survivors. Various cancer- and treatment-specific complementary USD modules are developed (
      • Ijzerman-Korevaar M.
      • Snijders T.J.
      • Teunissen S.C.C.M.
      • De Graeff A.
      • De Vos F.Y.F.
      Symptom monitoring in glioma patients: development of the Edmonton symptom assessment System glioma module.
      ), however none is aimed at TGCT-patients. To develop such a specific USD module for TGCT-patients, it is necessary to first determine the existing late effects. Since experienced late effects could differ between different treatment-schedules and follow-up years (
      • Chovanec M.
      • Lauritsen J.
      • Bandak M.
      • Oing C.
      • Kier G.G.
      • Kreiberg M.
      • Rosenvilde J.
      • Wagner T.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Daugaard G.
      Late adverse effects and quality of life in survivors of testicular germ cell tumour.
      ), a distinction will be made between these groups, to assess whether one potential USD module is suitable for all treatment-schedules and follow-up years of TGCT-patients.

      2. Aims

      The primary aim of this study was to identify the prevalence and intensity of late effects in TGCT-patients currently in follow-up care, covering the physical, social, psychical and existential domains of care, as a first step of instrument development.
      The secondary aims were:
      • -
        To identify the difference in prevalence and intensity of late effects between TGCT-patients who underwent different treatment-schedules (e.g. chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery or a combination).
      • -
        To identify the difference in prevalence and intensity of late effects between TGCT-patients during different years of follow-up care after treatment.

      3. Method

      3.1 Design

      A cross-sectional study, using a stepwise approach, was conducted. Data concerning late effects of TGCT-patients were obtained between February 2021 and February 2022 in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). The study was reported according to The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (
      • Von Elm E.
      • Altman D.G.
      • Egger M.
      • Pocock S.J.
      • Gøtzsche P.C.
      • Vandenbroucke J.P.
      The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
      ). The first phase of the stepwise approach comprised of systematically assessing literature to determine all described late effects in TGCT-patients, where after a complete list of late effects was created. Secondly, to reach a certain level of completeness and content validity, this generated list was critically assessed by healthcare professionals and the research group. Lastly, the complete and revised generated list of late effects was converted into a survey. Afterwards, the survey was administered to TGCT-patients in follow-up care.

      3.2 Population and domain

      The population of this study consisted of both healthcare professionals and TGCT-patients.
      In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a healthcare professional needed to meet the following criteria: providing follow-up care to TGCT-patients, and at least one-year experience in providing care to TGCT-patients, to ensure thorough insight in late effects.
      In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a TGCT-patient needed to meet all of the following criteria: ≥18 years old, no cognitive impairment, able to fill in the online survey, and currently in follow-up care in the UMCU outpatient clinic.

      3.3 Data collection and study procedures

      3.3.1 Literature review of late effects

      For creating the list of late effects and the survey, as a first step, a literature review was undertaken to identify all described late effects in TGCT-patients. The literature review was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (
      • Higgins J.
      • Thomas J.
      • Chandler J.
      • Cumpston M.
      • Li T.
      • Page M.
      • Welch V.
      Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of Interventions.
      ). The electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library were searched for eligible articles up to December 20th, 2020. The complete search strategy, inclusion- and exclusion criteria can be found in the appendix.
      All identified late effects were listed, doubles were removed and different translations for the same late effect were merged, and translated into Dutch. Late effects were converted into understandable symptoms for TGCT-patients. This process was performed by two researchers (RE and DZ).

      3.3.2 Assessment of late effects by healthcare professionals

      Thereafter, healthcare professionals, providing follow-up care to TGCT-patients, were asked to provide expert opinion and prioritization on the generated items through an online Castor EDC survey to reach completeness and content validity. Also, peer group discussion in the research group was held.

      3.3.3 Survey for TGCT-patients

      In the next step, TGCT-patients were recruited by their nurse specialist (DZ) during consultation in the outpatient clinic of the UMCU. The complete and revised list of late effects was presented in an online Castor EDC survey for TGCT-patients. To measure the main study parameters, the prevalence and intensity of late effects in TGCT-patients, every late effect was accompanied by an NRS score, as standard according to the USD (
      • van der Baan F.H.
      • Koldenhof J.J.
      • de Nijs E.J.
      • Echteld M.A.
      • Zweers D.
      • Hesselmann G.M.
      • Vervoort S.C.
      • Vos J.B.
      • de Graaf E.
      • Witteveen P.O.
      • Suijkerbuijk K.P.
      • de Graeff A.
      • Teunissen S.C.
      Validation of the Dutch version of the Edmonton symptom assessment System.
      ). An NRS score of zero meant absence of the late effect, and numbers one to ten meant a prevalent effect, with higher scores representing higher intensity of the prevalent late effect. Patients were asked to score an NRS, based on experienced burden during the last three months. Besides, patients were invited to prioritize the late effects, according to their situation. Baseline data were assessed to measure the secondary study parameters; difference in prevalence and intensity of late effects in TGCT-patients who underwent different treatment schedules and during different years of follow-up after treatment. Baseline data such as age, comorbidity, treatment schedule, social status, employment status and WHO performance status were asked.

      3.4 Data analysis

      Both descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). The complete datasets of both healthcare-professionals and TGCT-patients were checked for missing values. Missing data occurred in <10% of data, therefore no imputation method was performed (
      • Bennett D.A.
      How can I deal with missing data in my study?.
      ;
      • Field A.
      Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Statistics.
      ).
      For data presentation of healthcare professionals, only descriptive statistics were used.
      To meet the primary aim of this study, an estimated sample size of 45 patients was needed, based on a similar study (
      • Ijzerman-Korevaar M.
      • Snijders T.J.
      • Teunissen S.C.C.M.
      • De Graeff A.
      • De Vos F.Y.F.
      Symptom monitoring in glioma patients: development of the Edmonton symptom assessment System glioma module.
      ). For the primary aim, descriptive statistics were used to provide insight in overall prevalence and intensity of late effects.
      To answer the secondary aims, a minimal sample size of 15 patients per category (e.g. treatment schedule or years in follow-up) was required (
      • Johnson C.
      • Aaronson N.
      • Blazeby J.M.
      • Bottomley A.
      • Fayers P.
      • Koller M.
      • Kuliś D.
      • Ramage J.
      • Sprangers M.
      • Velikova G.
      • Young T.
      EORTC quality of life group guidelines for developing questionnaire modules.
      ). To answer both secondary aims of this study, a total of 75 (5x15) patients was needed.
      Due to an unequal distribution of patients in the different years of follow-up, and the different treatment schedules, analysis was performed using dichotomized categories (
      • Field A.
      Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Statistics.
      ). For follow-up, ‘early follow-up’ was defined as the first two years of follow-up, including the category ’different’ in which patients experienced recurrence of cancer and received additional treatments, therefore not progressing to the later follow-up years. ‘Late follow-up’ was defined as the last three years of follow-up. For treatment-schedules, analysis was performed using dichotomized categories. These categories included ‘surgery, chemotherapy or radiation’ and ‘surgery combined with salvage chemotherapy’.
      To test for differences in prevalent late effects between dichotomized categories of follow-up groups or treatment-schedules, a Chi-Square test was performed. Fisher's Exact test was performed instead when expected counts were not met (
      • Field A.
      Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Statistics.
      ). To test for mean differences in intensity of late effects between dichotomized categories of follow-up groups or treatment-schedules, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed. Statistical significance was calculated two-sided and set at p < 0,05. In this new field of research, significance levels will provide insight and will be used to generate hypotheses for new research.
      To gain insight in TGCT-patients’ prioritization of late effects, patients were asked to prioritize three late effects which had most influence on their daily life or bothers them most.

      3.5 Ethical considerations

      This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (64th version, October 2013) (), the Dutch code of conduct for research integrity (
      KNAWNFUNWOTO2-federatieVereniging HogescholenVSNU
      Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity.
      ), the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) (
      CCMO
      Your research: is it subject to the WMO or not?.
      ), and the General Data Protection Regulation (in Dutch: UAVG) (
      • Overheid
      Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming - BWBR0040940.
      ). The study was no subject to the WMO, according to the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of the UMCU, reference number 21–040/C.
      Informed consent of all participants was obtained during the first questions of both online surveys. Surveys were only sent after health-care professionals and patients provided permission to their colleague or nurse specialist (DZ) to be approached by e-mail by the executive researcher (RE).

      4. Results

      4.1 Literature review of late effects

      Running the searches in the electronic databases resulted in 2029 articles. After the duplicates were removed, the search resulted in 1700 potentially relevant articles. Initial screening of titles and abstracts excluded a further 1441 articles. For the 259 remaining articles full-text was obtained. Of these remaining articles, 181 did not meet all eligibility criteria, resulting in the inclusion of 78 articles for the literature review (Fig. 1). Furthermore, screening reference lists did not result in more eligible articles.
      Fig. 1
      Fig. 1Flowscheme of included studies (PRISMA) (
      • Moher D.
      • Liberati A.
      • Tetzlaff J.
      • Altman D.G.
      Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
      ).

      4.2 Assessment of late effects

      4.2.1 Peer group discussion

      After performing the review, merging and translating late effects to Dutch, and requesting expert-opinion, a peer group discussion in the research group was held to formulate assessable symptoms. This process resulted in the list of late effects or symptoms as presented in Fig. 2.

      4.3 Healthcare professionals

      4.3.1 Demographic data

      Ten out of thirteen approached healthcare professionals (nurse specialists (7), urologists (2) and an internist-oncologist (1)) responded to the survey-invitation. Their median age was 44 years (IQR 39,2–48,5). The median work experience in follow-up care for TGCT-patients was 7 years (IQR 3–13,5).

      4.3.2 Results

      Four healthcare professionals recognized all described late effects from their daily clinical practice. Late effects ‘sleep problem’ and ‘reduced appetite’ were recognized by all health care professionals. The described late effects were prioritized, in which ‘fatigue’ was prioritized first most often (Table 1).
      Table 1Priority of late effects by health-care professionals.
      Late effectPriority 1, nPriority 2, nPriority 3, nTotal, n
      Fatigue527
      Overall well-being2114
      Concentration problems112
      Neuropathy1214
      Depressed mood11
      Anxiety123
      Discoloration of fingers or tows11
      Tinnitus11
      Changes in weight11
      Reduced self-confidence112
      Concerns about fertility112
      Erectile dysfunction11
      Changes in sexual life11

      4.4 Survey for TGCT-patients

      4.4.1 Demographic data

      In total, 108 participants were approached during follow-up consultation for participating in this study. The survey was completed by 65 participants (60,2%). The mean age of participants was 36.4 years (±9.1). Most participants are living together with their families. Of all participants, 90.8% indicated their performance status as WHO 0, meaning they are fully active and able to carry on all pre-disease performances. Sixteen TGCT-patients (24.6%) suffered from any comorbidity. The majority of the TGCT-patients (63.1%) received surgery, followed by multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Most of included TGCT-patients (29.2%) were currently in the second follow-up year (Table 2).
      Table 2Characteristics of TGCT-patients.
      CharacteristicsIncluded patients (n = 65)
      Age, median (IQR)35.0 (29.5-43.5)
      Social status, n (%)
      • -
        Single
      11 (16.9)
      • -
        Living together with partner
      20 (30.8)
      • -
        Married
      27 (41.5)
      • -
        Different
      7 (10.8)
      Social status children, n (%)
      • -
        Yes, living at home
      29 (44.6)
      • -
        Yes, living elsewhere
      2 (3.1)
      • -
        No
      34 (52.3)
      Employment status, n (%)
      • -
        Not employed
      2 (3.1)
      • -
        Sickness benefits
      1 (1.5)
      • -
        On payroll
      43 (66.2)
      • -
        Self-employed without employees
      7 (10.8)
      • -
        Social assistance benefit
      0 (0)
      • -
        Different
      12 (18.5)
      WHO performance status, n (%)
      • -
        0) Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction
      59 (90.8)
      • -
        1) Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work
      4 (6.2)
      • -
        2) Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours
      2 (3.1)
      • -
        3) Capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours
      0 (0)
      • -
        4) Completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair
      0 (0)
      Treatment, n (%)
      Surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation24 (36.9)
      • -
        Surgery (orchiectomy)
      13 (20.0)
      • -
        Surgery, followed by one cycle of chemotherapy
      6 (9.2)
      • -
        Surgery, followed by radiation
      5 (7.7)
      • Surgery combined with salvage chemotherapy
      41 (63.1)
      • -
        Surgery, followed by multiple cycles of chemotherapy
      31 (47.7)
      • -
        Different (i.e. multiple lines of chemotherapy or surgery, chemotherapy and radiation)
      10 (15.4)
      Year of follow-up care, n (%)
      Early follow-up31 (47.6)
      • -
        1 year
      6 (9.2)
      • -
        2 years
      19 (29.2)
      • -
        Different (i.e. recurrences)
      6 (9.2)
      Late follow-up34 (52.3)
      • -
        3 years
      14 (21.5)
      • -
        4 years
      8 (12.3)
      • -
        5 years
      12 (18.5)

      4.4.2 Results

      4.4.2.1 Prevalence and intensity of late effects

      TGCT-patients indicated ‘fatigue’, ‘disturbed overall well-being’, ‘concentration problems’ and ‘neuropathy’ as most prevalent late effects. Intensity of late effects was scored highest for ‘fatigue’, ‘disturbed overall well-being’, ‘concentration problems’ and ‘neuropathy’ as well (Table 3).
      Table 3Prevalence and intensity of late effects according to TGCT-patients.
      Late effectPrevalence, n (%)Intensity of late effects, NRS, median (range)
      Fatigue39 (60.0)2 (0-9)
      Overall well-being (disturbed)37 (56.9)1 (0-9)
      Concentration problems36 (55.4)1 (0-9)
      Neuropathy34 (52.3)1 (0-10)
      Quickly irritated27 (41.5)0 (0-10)
      Concerns about fertility27 (41.5)0 (0-10)
      Changes in sexual life27 (41.5)0 (0-8)
      Depressed mood26 (40.0)0 (0-8)
      Reduced self-confidence25 (38.5)0 (0-7)
      Memory problems25 (38.5)0 (0-8)
      Tinnitus24 (36.9)0 (0-8)
      Skin problems24 (36.9)0 (0-8)
      Thirsty24 (21.5)0 (0-8)
      Reduced libido24 (36.9)0 (0-8)
      Listless23 (35.4)0 (0-9)
      Sleep problems22 (33.8)0 (0-8)
      Pain21 (32.3)0 (0-5)
      Anxiety20 (30.8)0 (0-10)
      Hearing impairment20 (30.8)0 (0-7)
      Sweating20 (30.8)0 (0-8)
      Changes in weight18 (27.7)0 (0-10)
      Diarrhea16 (24.6)0 (0-7)
      Erectile dysfunction15 (23.1)0 (0-5)
      Feeling bloated15 (23.1)0 (0-7)
      Problems with urinating14 (21.5)0 (0-5)
      Disturbed stool pattern14 (21,5)0 (0-6)
      Raynaud's phenomena14 (21.5)0 (0-8)
      Drowsy13 (20.0)0 (0-7)
      Shortness of breath11 (16.9)0 (0-6)
      Constipation11 (16.9)0 (0-4)
      Palpitations11 (16.9)0 (0-5)
      Dizzy9 (13.8)0 (0-7)
      Changes in taste8 (12.3)0 (0-8)
      Damaged oral mucosa7 (10.8)0 (0-8)
      Nausea7 (23.1)0 (0-5)
      Reduced appetite5 (7.7)0 (0-5)
      Painful mouth4 (10.8)0 (0-10)
      Swallowing problems4 (6.2)0 (0-5)

      4.4.2.2 Prevalence and intensity of late effects by years of follow-up

      Patients indicated ‘palpitations’ (p = 0.020) as significantly more prevalent during ‘late follow-up’ (Table 4). A trend was seen for more prevalent changes in sexual life for patients during early follow-up (p = 0.053).
      Table 4Prevalence of late effects by years of follow-up and by treatment schedule.
      Late effectPrevalence in ‘early follow-up’ n (%) (n = 31)Prevalence in ‘late follow-up’ n (%) (n = 34)P-valuePrevalence in ‘surgery adjuvant chemo or radiation’ n (%) (n = 26)Prevalence in ‘surgery combined with salvage chemo’ n (%) (n = 39)P-value
      Fatigue58,1 (18)61,8 (21)0.355A13 (50)26 (67)0.179A
      Overall well-being (disturbed)54,8 (17)64,5 (20)0.407A15 (58)22 (56)0.919A
      Neuropathy51,6 (16)52,9 (18)0.344A8 (31)26 (67)0.005A
      Concentration problems48,4 (15)61,8 (21)0.981A11 (42)25 (64)0.083A
      Quickly irritated45,2 (14)38,2 (13)0.155A11 (42)16 (41)0.918A
      Changes in sexual life48,4 (15)35,3 (12)0.053A13 (50)14 (36)0.258A
      Reduced libido41,9 (13)32,4 (11)0.114A12 (46)12 (31)0.208A
      Memory problems35,5 (11)41,2 (14)0.750A5 (19)20 (51)0.009A
      Changes in hair35,5 (11)38,2 (13)0.591A5 (19)19 (49)0.016A
      Changes in weight32,3 (10)23,5 (8)0.156A6 (23)12 (31)0.497A
      Tinnitus32,3 (10)41,2 (14)0.987A3 (12)21 (54)0.001A
      Concerns about fertility29,0 (9)52,9 (18)0.258A11 (42)16 (41)0.918A
      Depressed mood29,0 (9)50,0 (17)0.355A9 (35)17 (44)0.469A
      Reduced self-confidence29,0 (9)51,6 (16)0.474A8 (31)17 (44)0.298A
      Hearing impairment29,0 (9)32,4 (11)0.706A3 (12)17 (44)0.006A
      Skin problems25,8 (8)51,6 (16)0.304A7 (27)17 (44)0.173A
      Sleep problems25,8 (8)41,2 (14)0.545A9 (35)13 (33)0.915A
      Pain25,8 (8)38,2 (13)0.697A10 (39)11 (28)0.386A
      Sweating25,8 (8)35,3 (12)0.867A5 (19)15 (39)0.100A
      Listless22,6 (7)51,6 (16)0.179A9 (35)14 (36)0.916A
      Disturbed stool pattern22,6 (7)20,5 (7)0.468A7 (27)7 (18)0.389A
      Problems with urinating22,6 (7)20,5 (7)0.468A5 (19)9 (23)0.712A
      Erectile dysfunction22,6 (7)23,5 (8)0.646A4 (15)11 (28)0.229A
      Diarrhea22,6 (7)26,5 (9)0.836A6 (23)10 (26)0.814A
      Anxiety19,4 (6)41,2 (14)0.208A6 (23)14 (36)0.273A
      Feeling bloated16,1 (5)29,4 (10)0.462A5 (19)10 (26)0.548A
      Raynaud's phenomena16,1 (5)26,5 (9)0.618A3 (12)11 (28)0.109A
      Constipation16,1 (5)20,5 (7)1.000B5 (19)7 (18)1.000B
      Thirsty12,9 (4)29,4 (10)0.266A4 (15)10 (26)0.324A
      Drowsy12,9 (4)26,5 (9)0.378A4 (15)9 (23)0.448A
      Shortness of breath12,9 (4)20,5 (7)0.751B3 (12)8 (21)0.344B
      Changes in taste12,9 (4)11,8 (4)0.709B2 (8)6 (15)0.460B
      Damaged oral mucosa12,9 (4)8,8 (3)0.437B2 (8)5 (13)0.693B
      Dizzy9,7 (3)17,6 (6)0.590B2 (8)7 (18)0.241B
      Swallowing problems9,7 (3)2,9 (1)0.299B1 (4)3 (8)0.644B
      Nausea6,5 (2)14,7 (5)0.461B2 (8)5 (13)0.513B
      Palpitations3,2 (1)29,4 (10)0.020B4 (15)7 (18)1.000B
      Reduced appetite3,2 (1)11,8 (4)0.393B2 (8)3 (8)1.000B
      Painful mouth3,2 (1)8,8 (3)0.636B3 (12)1 (3)0.293B
      A Chi-square test used.
      B Fisher's exact test due to expected counts less than 5 in one of the cells.

      4.4.2.3 Prevalence and intensity of late effects by treatment-schedule

      Patients indicated ‘neuropathy’ (p = 0.005), ‘memory problems’ (p = 0.009), ‘changes in hair’ (p = 0.016), and ‘hearing impairment’ (p = 0.006) as significantly more prevalent in the group ‘surgery combined with salvage chemotherapy’.
      ‘Changes in hair’ (p = 0.014), ‘neuropathy’ (p = 0.009), ‘memory problems’ (p = 0.008), ‘hearing impairment’ (p = 0.004), ‘tinnitus’ (p = 0.000) and ‘concentration problems’ (p = 0.050) showed differences between groups, with higher intensity in the group ‘surgery combined with salvage chemotherapy’ (Table 5).
      Table 5Intensity of late effects by treatment-schedule.
      Late effectGroupMean sum of ranksp-value
      Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).
      Changes in hairSurgery, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation26.90p = 0.014
      Surgery, salvage chemotherapy37.06
      NeuropathySurgery, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation25.88p = 0.009
      Surgery, salvage chemotherapy37.74
      Memory problemsSurgery, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation26.35p = 0.008
      Surgery, salvage chemotherapy37.44
      Hearing impairmentSurgery, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation26.90p = 0.004
      Surgery, salvage chemotherapy37.53
      TinnitusSurgery, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation24.15p = 0.000
      Surgery, salvage chemotherapy38.90
      Concentration problemsSurgery, adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation27.65p = 0.050
      Surgery, salvage chemotherapy36.56
      a Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed).

      4.4.2.4 Prioritizing late effects

      Most patients (67.7%) indicated ‘not -applicable’ in all three prioritization categories. In the first place ‘neuropathy’, ‘fatigue’ and ‘concerns about fertility’ scored 17%, 9.2% and 9.2% respectively. Secondly, ‘fatigue’ and ‘memory problems’ were scored by 7.7% of patients. In third place, ‘changes in sexual life’ scored 7.7%, ‘fatigue’ and ‘tinnitus’ were scored by 4.6% of patients (Table 6).
      Table 6Priority of late effects according to TGCT-patients.
      Late effectPriority 1, n (%)Priority 2, n (%)Priority 3, n (%)Total, n (%)
      Neuropathy11 (17)3 (4.6)2 (3.1)16 (24.6)
      Fatigue6 (9.2)5 (7.7)3 (4.6)14 (21.5)
      Concerns about fertility6 (9.2)3 (4.6)1 (1.5)9 (13.8)
      Reynaud5 (7.7)3 (4.6)8 (12.3)
      Tinnitus5 (7.7)4 (6.2)3 (4.6)12 (18.5)
      Pain4 (6.2)2 (3.1)2 (3.1)8 (12.3)
      Changes in sexual life3 (4.6)4 (8.9)5 (7.7)12 (18.5)
      Memory problems2 (3.1)5 (7.7)2 (3.1)9 (13.8)
      Not applicable9 (13.8)16 (24.6)19 (29.2)44 (67.7)

      5. Discussion

      This study aimed to provide unique insights in the prevalence and intensity of late effects in TGCT-patients, as a first step of instrument development. More than half of included TGCT-patients indicated ‘fatigue’, ‘disturbed overall well-being’, ‘concentration problems’ and ‘neuropathy’, as most prevalent late effects. For intensity, the same late effects showed the highest median score on the NRS as well, although the highest median was ‘only’ two on the NRS.
      When late effects were distinguished by years of follow-up, only ‘palpitations’ and ‘changes in sexual life’ showed a tendency for more prevalence during early follow-up. For intensity of late effects, a trend was seen for ‘palpitations’, which was scored significantly higher in the group ‘late follow-up’.
      When late effects were distinguished by treatment-schedules, ‘neuropathy’, ‘memory problems’, ‘changes in hair’, and ‘hearing impairment’ showed differences in prevalence and intensity as well.
      Correspondingly, late effects ‘neuropathy’, ‘memory problems’, ‘changes in hair’, ‘hearing impairment’ and ‘concentration problems’ are widely known both in clinical practice and in literature for their impact in TGCT-survivors (
      • Chovanec M.
      • Lauritsen J.
      • Bandak M.
      • Oing C.
      • Kier G.G.
      • Kreiberg M.
      • Rosenvilde J.
      • Wagner T.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Daugaard G.
      Late adverse effects and quality of life in survivors of testicular germ cell tumour.
      ;
      • Fung C.
      • Dinh P.
      • Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard S.
      • Schaffer K.
      • Fossa S.D.
      • Travis L.B.
      Toxicities associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy in long-term testicular cancer survivors.
      ,
      • Fung C.
      • Dinh P.C.
      • Fossa S.D.
      • Travis L.B.
      Testicular cancer survivorship.
      ), as well as other cancer survivors (
      • Buccafusca G.
      • Proserpio I.
      • Tralongo A.C.
      • Giuliano S.R.
      • Tralongo P.
      Early colorectal cancer: diagnosis, treatment and survivorship care.
      ;
      • Joly F.
      • Lange M.
      • Santos M. Dos
      • Vaz-Luis I.
      • Meglio A. Di
      Long-term fatigue and cognitive disorders in breast cancer survivors.
      ). Similarly as in this study, a recent systematic review showed TGCT-patients experienced a relatively low burden of disease and treatment compared to other types of cancer, although patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy experienced more impact on their mental health status (
      • Alexis O.
      • Adeleye A.O.
      • Worsley A.J.
      Men's experiences of surviving testicular cancer: an integrated literature review.
      ).
      The tendency of differences between treatment groups as found in this study could be explained by clinical experience and the widely known toxicities of bleomycin and platinum-based chemotherapies (, ).
      For differences between follow-up years, in this study, a trend was seen for palpitations and changes in sexual life.
      Palpitations are defined as a rapid pulsation or irregular beating of the heart and is one of the common presenting problems in the emergency room (
      • Essa H.
      • Lip G.
      Palpitations in the cancer patient.
      ). Based on our findings and literature no satisfactory explanation can be identified why palpitations are more frequently experienced during late follow-up, in this study (
      • Essa H.
      • Lip G.
      Palpitations in the cancer patient.
      ).
      Patients indicated a trend of a higher prevalence of ‘changes in sexual life’ in the group ‘early follow-up’. TGCT-patients may experience lower overall satisfaction in sexual life shortly after treatment, due to psychological and physical complaints as erectile dysfunction, lower levels of testosterone and negative changed body image (
      • Chovanec M.
      • Vasilkova L.
      • Petrikova L.
      • Obertova J.
      • Palacka P.
      • Rejlekova K.
      • Sycova-Mila Z.
      • Kalavska K.
      • Svetlovska D.
      • Mladosievicova B.
      • Mardiak J.
      • Mego M.
      Long-term sexual functioning in germ-cell tumor survivors.
      ;
      • Rossen P.
      • Pedersen A.F.
      • Zachariae R.
      • Von Der Maase H.
      Sexuality and body image in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. Eur.
      ), with satisfaction increasing during follow-up years. A recent systematic review substantiates this finding as well, describing overall satisfaction with sexual life was even higher in TGCT-survivors (11–14 years after treatment) than in healthy controls (
      • Bogefors C.
      • Isaksson S.
      • Bobjer J.
      • Kitlinski M.
      • Leijonhufvud I.
      • Link K.
      • Giwercman A.
      Hypogonadism in testicular cancer patients is associated with risk factors of cardiovascular disease and the metabolic syndrome.
      ;
      • Chovanec M.
      • Lauritsen J.
      • Bandak M.
      • Oing C.
      • Kier G.G.
      • Kreiberg M.
      • Rosenvilde J.
      • Wagner T.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Daugaard G.
      Late adverse effects and quality of life in survivors of testicular germ cell tumour.
      ). Hypothetically, after experiencing difficulties in sexual life, TGCT-survivors may appreciate their overall sexual life more.
      The stepwise approach toward a first draft of instrument development can be considered a strength of this study, as well as the thorough and systematic literature review. Another strength is the gap this study is aiming to resolve, since no instrument currently exists to assess the late effects of TGCT-patients during follow-up (
      • Klonoff-Cohen H.
      • Polavarapu M.
      Existence of late-effects instruments for cancer survivors: a systematic review.
      ).
      Another strength of this study is the fact that prior to distributing the survey to TGCT-patients, healthcare professionals provided their opinion and prioritization on the complete list of late effects. Healthcare professionals recognized all described late effects and prioritized ‘fatigue’, ‘disturbed overall well-being’, ‘neuropathy’ and ‘concentration problems’ based on their clinical practice in follow-up care for TGCT-patients. This is in complete accordance with the late effects indicated as most prevalent and scored with highest intensity by TGCT-patients.
      Nevertheless, this study contains several limitations. Since testicular cancer represents one percent of neoplasms in male worldwide (
      • Laguna M.P.
      • Albers P.
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Klepp O.
      • Kisbenedek L.
      • Leiva O.
      EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
      ), this domain is quite small. In the Netherlands, about 832 men are diagnosed with testicular cancer yearly (). Although the sample size of this study contained only 65 patients from the outpatient clinic of the UMCU, this sample still represents a substantial part of Dutch TGCT-patients in follow-up care. Besides, this sample group of 65 patients is also considered representative of the TGCT population since all treatment-groups and follow-up years are present.
      The start of follow-up care was marked as complete remission on CT-scan, 6 months after completion of treatment. In the Netherlands, TGCT-patients are in follow-up care for a minimum of five years (
      • Algaba F.
      • Bokemeyer C.
      • Boormans J.
      • Fischer S.
      • Fizazi K.
      • Gremmels H.
      • Leão R.
      • Nicol D.
      • Nicolai N.
      • Oldenburg J.
      • Tandstad T.
      EAU Guidelines on Testicular Cancer.
      ), as followed in this study. However, some may consider another marking point of follow-up care, which may influence results in follow-up groups.
      For answering the secondary aims, a minimum of 75 patients was needed, this sample size was not met due to data collection during the Covid-19 pandemic, which probably led to decreased response.
      Besides, a non-equal distribution of participants amongst treatment-schedules and follow-up years was found. However, an appropriate solution was found by dichotomizing both the treatment- and follow-up groups for statistical analysis. These results however, should be interpreted with caution. In our study, results will be used to explore a trend toward differences between groups and formulate hypotheses for further research developing the new USD-module for TGCT-patients.
      For further research validation of the new USD item list should be performed to provide an appropriate USD-module for TGCT-patients in follow-up care. With standardized application of the validated USD-module, follow-up care can improve by empowering patients to discuss important items in daily life with their health-care professional.

      6. Conclusion

      This study provides unique insights into the prevalence and intensity of late effects in TGCT-patients. All described late effects were recognized by TGCT-patients, with ‘fatigue’, ‘disturbed overall well-being’, ‘concentration problems’ and ‘neuropathy’, indicated as most prevalent and scored with highest intensity. This broad exploration is of great value to get insight into the burden of late effects for TGCT patients during follow-up care and develop a specific TGCT USD-module for standardized monitoring of individually experienced symptom burden.

      Declaration of interests

      None declared.

      CRediT authorship contribution statement

      Roos Enzlin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Sigrid C.J.M. Vervoort: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Britt B.M. Suelmann: Writing – review & editing. Richard P. Meijer: Writing – review & editing. Saskia C.C.M. Teunissen: Writing – review & editing. Danielle Zweers: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

      Appendix A. Supplementary data

      The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

      References

        • Alexis O.
        • Adeleye A.O.
        • Worsley A.J.
        Men's experiences of surviving testicular cancer: an integrated literature review.
        J. Cancer Surviv. 2020; 14: 284-293https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00841-2
        • Algaba F.
        • Bokemeyer C.
        • Boormans J.
        • Fischer S.
        • Fizazi K.
        • Gremmels H.
        • Leão R.
        • Nicol D.
        • Nicolai N.
        • Oldenburg J.
        • Tandstad T.
        EAU Guidelines on Testicular Cancer.
        2021
        • Bennett D.A.
        How can I deal with missing data in my study?.
        Aust. N. Z. J. Publ. Health. 2001; 25: 464-469https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00294.x
        • Bogefors C.
        • Isaksson S.
        • Bobjer J.
        • Kitlinski M.
        • Leijonhufvud I.
        • Link K.
        • Giwercman A.
        Hypogonadism in testicular cancer patients is associated with risk factors of cardiovascular disease and the metabolic syndrome.
        Andrology. 2017; 5: 711-717https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12354
        • Bruera E.
        • Kuehn N.
        • Miller M.J.
        • Selmser P.A.L.
        • Macmillan K.
        Simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients.
        J. Palliat. Care. 1991; 7: 6-9
        • Buccafusca G.
        • Proserpio I.
        • Tralongo A.C.
        • Giuliano S.R.
        • Tralongo P.
        Early colorectal cancer: diagnosis, treatment and survivorship care.
        Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2019; : 20-30https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.023
        • CCMO
        Your research: is it subject to the WMO or not?.
        Investigators | The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. 2020; ([WWW Document]) (URL) (January0.22.20)
        • Chovanec M.
        • Vasilkova L.
        • Petrikova L.
        • Obertova J.
        • Palacka P.
        • Rejlekova K.
        • Sycova-Mila Z.
        • Kalavska K.
        • Svetlovska D.
        • Mladosievicova B.
        • Mardiak J.
        • Mego M.
        Long-term sexual functioning in germ-cell tumor survivors.
        BMC Cancer. 2020; 20: 779https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07301-6
        • Chovanec M.
        • Lauritsen J.
        • Bandak M.
        • Oing C.
        • Kier G.G.
        • Kreiberg M.
        • Rosenvilde J.
        • Wagner T.
        • Bokemeyer C.
        • Daugaard G.
        Late adverse effects and quality of life in survivors of testicular germ cell tumour.
        Nat. Rev. Urol. 2021; 18: 227-245https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00440-w
        • Essa H.
        • Lip G.
        Palpitations in the cancer patient.
        Eur. Cardiol. 2021; 16https://doi.org/10.15420/ECR.2021.44
        • Field A.
        Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Statistics.
        SAGE, 2013
        • Fung C.
        • Dinh P.
        • Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard S.
        • Schaffer K.
        • Fossa S.D.
        • Travis L.B.
        Toxicities associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy in long-term testicular cancer survivors.
        Adv. Urol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8671832
        • Fung C.
        • Dinh P.C.
        • Fossa S.D.
        • Travis L.B.
        Testicular cancer survivorship.
        J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2019; 17: 1557-1568https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.7369
        • Higgins J.
        • Thomas J.
        • Chandler J.
        • Cumpston M.
        • Li T.
        • Page M.
        • Welch V.
        Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of Interventions.
        Cochrane. 2019; (version 6.0 (updated July 2019) [WWW Document]) (URL) (9.January.20)
        • Honecker F.
        • Aparicio J.
        • Berney D.
        • Beyer J.
        • Bokemeyer C.
        • Cathomas R.
        • Clarke N.
        • Cohn-Cedermark G.
        • Daugaard G.
        • Dieckmann K.P.
        • Fizazi K.
        • Fosså S.
        • Germa-Lluch J.R.
        • Giannatempo P.
        • Gietema J.A.
        • Gillessen S.
        • Haugnes H.S.
        • Heidenreich A.
        • Hemminki K.
        • Huddart R.
        • Jewett M.A.S.
        • Joly F.
        • Lauritsen J.
        • Lorch A.
        • Necchi A.
        • Nicolai N.
        • Oing C.
        • Oldenburg J.
        • Ondrus D.
        • Papachristofilou A.
        • Powles T.
        • Sohaib A.
        • Ståhl O.
        • Tandstad T.
        • Toner G.
        • Horwich A.
        ESMO consensus conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.
        Ann. Oncol. 2018; 29: 1658-1686https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy217
        • Hui D.
        • Bruera E.
        The Edmonton symptom assessment System 25 Years later: past, present, and future developments.
        J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2017; 53: 630-643https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.370
        • Ijzerman-Korevaar M.
        • Snijders T.J.
        • Teunissen S.C.C.M.
        • De Graeff A.
        • De Vos F.Y.F.
        Symptom monitoring in glioma patients: development of the Edmonton symptom assessment System glioma module.
        J. Neurosci. Nurs. 2018; 50: 381-387https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000400
        • IKNL
        Meetinstrumenten in de palliatieve zorg.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (September.17.20)
        • Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland
        NKR cijfers - IKNL.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (May.3.21))
        • Johnson C.
        • Aaronson N.
        • Blazeby J.M.
        • Bottomley A.
        • Fayers P.
        • Koller M.
        • Kuliś D.
        • Ramage J.
        • Sprangers M.
        • Velikova G.
        • Young T.
        EORTC quality of life group guidelines for developing questionnaire modules.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (10.July.20)
        • Joly F.
        • Lange M.
        • Santos M. Dos
        • Vaz-Luis I.
        • Meglio A. Di
        Long-term fatigue and cognitive disorders in breast cancer survivors.
        Cancers. 2019; 11: 1896https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121896
        • Klonoff-Cohen H.
        • Polavarapu M.
        Existence of late-effects instruments for cancer survivors: a systematic review.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15: 1-12https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229222
        • KNAW
        • NFU
        • NWO
        • TO2-federatie
        • Vereniging Hogescholen
        • VSNU
        Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity.
        ([WWW Document])
        • Kompas Farmacotherapeutisch
        cisplatine.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (5.January.21)
        • Kompas Farmacotherapeutisch
        bleomycine.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (5.January.21)
        • Laguna M.P.
        • Albers P.
        • Algaba F.
        • Bokemeyer C.
        • Boormans J.
        • Fischer S.
        • Klepp O.
        • Kisbenedek L.
        • Leiva O.
        EAU guidelines on testicular cancer.
        ([WWW Document])
        • Lauritsen J.
        • Bandak M.
        • Kreiberg M.
        • Skøtt J.W.
        • Wagner T.
        • Rosenvilde J.J.
        • Dysager L.
        • Agerbæk M.
        • Daugaard G.
        Long-term neurotoxicity and quality of life in testicular cancer survivors-a nationwide cohort study.
        J. Cancer Surviv. 2021; 15: 509-517https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00944-1
        • Moch H.
        • Cubilla A.L.
        • Humphrey P.A.
        • Reuter V.E.
        • Ulbright T.M.
        The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary System and male genital organs - Part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours.
        Eur. Urol. 2016; 70: 93-105https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        Br Med J. 2009; 339: 2535https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
        • National Cancer Institute
        Definition of late effect - NCI dictionary of cancer terms.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (September.29.20)
        • Oechsle K.
        • Goerth K.
        • Bokemeyer C.
        • Mehnert A.
        Symptom burden in palliative care patients: perspectives of patients, their family caregivers, and their attending physicians.
        Support. Care Cancer. 2013; 21: 1955-1962https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1747-1
        • Overheid
        Uitvoeringswet Algemene verordening gegevensbescherming - BWBR0040940.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (11.June.20)
        • Rhondali W.
        • Hui D.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Kilgore K.
        • Kang J.H.
        • Nguyen L.
        • Bruera E.
        Association between patient-reported symptoms and nurses' clinical impressions in cancer patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit.
        J. Palliat. Med. 2012; 15: 301-307https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2011.0403
        • Rossen P.
        • Pedersen A.F.
        • Zachariae R.
        • Von Der Maase H.
        Sexuality and body image in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. Eur.
        J. Cancer. 2012; 48: 571-578https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.029
        • Söllner W.
        • DeVries A.
        • Steixner E.
        • Lukas P.
        • Sprinzl G.
        • Rumpold G.
        • Maislinger S.
        How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling?.
        Br. J. Cancer. 2001; 84: 179-185https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2000.1545
        • Travis L.B.
        • Beard C.
        • Allan J.M.
        • Dahl A.A.
        • Feldman D.R.
        • Oldenburg J.
        • Daugaard G.
        • Kelly J.L.
        • Dolan M.E.
        • Hannigan R.
        • Constine L.S.
        • Oeffinger K.C.
        • Okunieff P.
        • Armstrong G.
        • Wiljer D.
        • Miller R.C.
        • Gietema J.A.
        • Van Leeuwen F.E.
        • Williams J.P.
        • Nichols C.R.
        • Einhorn L.H.
        • Fossa S.D.
        Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations.
        J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2010; 102: 1114-1130https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq216
        • van der Baan F.H.
        • Koldenhof J.J.
        • de Nijs E.J.
        • Echteld M.A.
        • Zweers D.
        • Hesselmann G.M.
        • Vervoort S.C.
        • Vos J.B.
        • de Graaf E.
        • Witteveen P.O.
        • Suijkerbuijk K.P.
        • de Graeff A.
        • Teunissen S.C.
        Validation of the Dutch version of the Edmonton symptom assessment System.
        Cancer Med. 2020; 9: 6111-6121https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3253
        • Von Elm E.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Egger M.
        • Pocock S.J.
        • Gøtzsche P.C.
        • Vandenbroucke J.P.
        The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
        Ann. Intern. Med. 2007; 147: 573-577
        • Williamson S.R.
        • Delahunt B.
        • Magi-Galluzzi C.
        • Algaba F.
        • Egevad L.
        • Ulbright T.M.
        • Tickoo S.K.
        • Srigley J.R.
        • Epstein J.I.
        • Berney D.M.
        • Amin M.B.
        • Compérat E.
        • Humphrey P.A.
        • Idrees M.T.
        • Lopez-Beltran A.
        • Montironi R.
        • Oliva E.
        • Perry-Keene J.
        • Verrill C.
        • Yilmaz A.
        • Young R.H.
        • Zhou M.
        The World health organization 2016 classification of testicular germ cell tumours: a review and update from the international society of urological pathology testis consultation panel.
        Histopathology. 2017; 70: 335-346https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13102
        • World Medical Association
        Current policies.
        ([WWW Document]. URL) (January0.22.20)
        • Znaor A.
        • Sarfati D.
        • Skakkebæk N.E.
        • Meyts E.R.
        • Laversanne M.
        • Kuli T.
        • Gurney J.
        • Mcglynn K.A.
        • Bray F.
        Testicular cancer incidence predictions in Europe 2010 – 2035: a rising burden despite population ageing.
        Int. J. Cancer. 2020; 147: 820-828https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32810